Expected, the Last Database main criticism of the production model proposed by the Constitutional Convention has not come from sectors close to "21st century socialism", but from the environmentalist spectrum. Despite the fact that the new constitutional text would Last Database result in greater regulation for those activities that generate damage to ecosystems —for example, it establishes a very particular protection for glaciers—, the difficulties in Last Database agreeing on the support of two thirds of the Convention made various aspects related to the environmental agenda remain for legislative discussion.
In fact, the Last Database Commission on the Environment, Rights of Nature, Common Natural Assets and the Economic Model was the one with the worst performance in the plenary session of the Constitutional Convention, and only achieved the approval of 21% of its Last Database proposals with two thirds of the conventional ones. The declaration ofBloomberg maintaining that it is a "reasonable text", in which there were no negative Last Database aspects for mining investment, marks part of the problems in environmental terms. Although the economic issue will continue to be part of the criticism of those who reject the text.
The hackneyed image of “chavista” will not fall into disuse—, it is likely that the final dispute will not come from that flank. In fact, more Last Database than what is incorporated into the constitutional text, in economic terms the discussion has focused on what has been left out and has Last Database been left to be defined by law, such as the statute of large-scale mining. Unlike the Environment, Rights of Nature, Common Natural Assets and Economic Model committees, the Political System and Forms of State committees Last Database obtained ostensibly better results before the plenary session, given that they reached the approval of 34% and 48% of their items.